Finding hidden treasure

Posted by Lisa Wilkins on Monday, January 28, 2008 2:35 PM PT
I’ll admit I’m not the biggest sports fan. I know that the Super Bowl is coming up (football, right?), at hockey games you watch the puck, and that Safeco Field has the best views of the Olympic Mountains and Puget Sound (only because I wasn’t watching the Mariners game I attended). But when msnbc.com’s Whine of the Week article plays the world’s smallest violin for well-paid sports-babies, I can’t get enough!  So how did I become a Whine junkie in a section I rarely tread?  Well, admittedly, I do work here in site UI design, so I sort of need to know where everything lives. But as I said, I’m not a sports fan, so where would a non-sporting, design-geek type find the very entertaining weekly Whine?
 
This is where you, our esteemed readers, come into play. What drives you to crossover into a topic you would have never gone before?  Did you discover the Answer Desk by John Schoen accidentally or are you savvy with our business section?  How about accessing yesterday’s Nightly News netcast or clips from this morning’s TODAY show?  Did you see that 150-inch flat screen television in our special coverage of the Consumer Electronics Show?

We want to know when, why and how to best showcase our exclusive content only found right here at msnbc.com.

Take a look at these design explorations below. Three of our features and coverage of a special event (the Consumer Electronics Show) are shown. 

Do you enjoy the “sample platter” of varied content from across the site in one area?

Sample platter #1 (click to see the full-size version)

Sample platter #2 (click to see the full-size version)

Or do you prefer to exploring each category’s content to peruse the news and maybe find something that strikes you along the way?

Categorically correct: (click to see the full-size version)

Good or bad, we like to hear how you look at the news.


Comments

Categorically correct; It feels like it's still under my power to cover as much as I want, when I want...
How about fixing the problems that are already on the site before adding more to the site? Every since your last "upgrade" the scores section has not worked. I have tried selecting my teams "several" times but still a big blank without any scores. Used to work fine before the upgrades...
Honestly, categorically corect is "good", but if you want to feature exclusive content (I sometimes forget news sites get a lot of content from AP and such), then something like platter 2 is better than platter 1 -- you seem to get more information (it feels) - the big pictures for video clips or whatever aren't terribly useful.  I mean, pictures are good, don't get me wrong, but when I'm 'skimming' for something that catches my interest, they kind of get in the way.  Pictures for top section headlines are probably appropriate, but for just a list of stories, I don't know that it helps too much.  I'm not sure how i feel about, for example, the abcnews.com design where when you hover over a story, pictures show up on the left of the page relating to the story along with related stories -- its nice, but it seems on any one page they have fewer stories than you do, and additionally while they have some 'news summary' pages with lists of stories, they are hard on the eyes. Comparing I think ABCNews has about 10 pages on the front page, and I'd guestimate that msnbc has about 80 (maybe exaggerating, but it feels like a lot more without clicking around).
I prefer #1 (or better - the way it used to be) a broad sampling - like page 1 of a newspaper -- I want to see all top stories so I can see all the big "news"!  Not one category at a time!
Hey...thanks for asking!
I like the catagorically correct version and really use the search feature a lot...especially if the article could be in several areas.
Your site design always rocks, but do you have any influence regarding the loopsided content?  Does anyone care, for instance, that MSNBC (tv) was lower in ratings that CNN Headline News?  If you guys were more balanced, you could take on FNC, because your web design is infinitely. better.
cat. correct is the best of the lot
I, too, prefer #1.  One suggestion is to automatically switch between the tabs every 10-15 seconds or so because when skimming, I don't like to have to click on the tabs - lazy, I know.
To correct myself -- in the last sentence where I said "10 pages on th front page" I meant "10 stories" -- i.e. links to pages.  I read what I wrote just now and it sounded funny.
I use both the sample platter and the categorically correct on any given day, never know what will strike my fancy
Barbara Doerr, Ronkonkoma NY
Categorically correct is my preference.  I generally want to ignore things I don't care about and don't want it mixed in with things I do care about.  When organized categorically I can do that very easily.


New comments to this post are disabled

About the blog

This is the work and the thoughts of msnbc.com's site design and editorial concepts groups and a place for us all to discuss design, content and the future of news.

We want this to be a conversation, where we tell you what we're up to and what's caught our eye, and you tell us your thoughts and ideas about the site's design, content and tools.

A tour of the redesign

Take the tour

Archives


Browse by date:

Browse by category:

Add this blog to your news reader